royal family/coronation

Joined
Apr 3, 2023
Messages
1,092
Reaction score
369
Points
352
Ballots
🗳️0.000000
DB Transfer
🔄0.000000
There's been a lot of controversy lately since King Charles inherited the thrones.
I am against the monarchy as I feel it's a sign of privilege without any role.
There are many charitable people who don't hold such privilege, and I feel our money is going to fund their lavish lifestyle.

What are your thoughts?
 
Since I'm American, I'm not too qualified to have an opinion, however, I tend to agree with the part of privilege that's funded by tax payers.
Makes sense. I know not many members here are from the UK, however the monarchy exists for all Commonwealth nations.
Do you keep up with the monarchy, out of curiosity? You aware of the controversy with respect to Harry and Meghan... and all that?
 
the fall out....sad.
it really is :(
What I find even more sad is how it's all in the media.
I do feel bad for people who are super well off financially, yet they have poor mental health. I think they are misunderstood by society. Just because someone is privileged does not mean that that is necessarily what they want.
I also feel that groupthink (i.e. the royal family are always right) can often lead to one being ostracised by society.
On the contrary, I find it hypocritical that they say they hate the media attention give public interviews and even went as far as to release a documentary and write a book complaining about the royal family.
 
In our country, we abolished the monarchy in 2008. I am against some people getting all privileges just because they are born into a certain family. I hate royalties, especially British Royalties. More than 50 percent of today's problems were created by the British Royal Family.
 
I am against some people getting all privileges just because they are born into a certain family. I hate royalties, especially British Royalties. More than 50 percent of today's problems were created by the British Royal Family.
Agreed, agreed and agreed :)

In our country
Where are you based if it's okay to ask? I imagine you may have been intentionally vague, and I apologise if this is an intrusive question :)
 
King Charles tried to stop the Duke of Sussex taking legal action against newspapers over alleged phone-hacking, court papers claim.

This article completely changes my view on Prince Harry; I totally understand why he wants to get his side of the story out now.

In a witness statement, Prince Harry said he was "summoned to Buckingham Palace" and told to drop the cases because of the effect on the family.

The duke is suing the publisher of the Sun, News Group Newspapers, over alleged unlawful information-gathering.

But NGN wants to stop his claim, saying he has run out of time to bring it.
Prince Harry's court papers also claim that his brother, Prince William, was paid a "very large sum" by the owners of the Sun newspaper to settle his own historical phone-hacking claims.

Hugh Grant says the publisher of The Sun newspaper used a "deliberate policy of false denials" to prevent him suing for breaches of his privacy.

Sounds like a common practice for the Sun to pry.

A witness statement from him alleges the paper commissioned private investigators to break into his home and steal his private information.

The actor was at the High Court for legal arguments as News UK attempted to get his case thrown out.


The publisher denies the claims and wants the judge to reject them.

Hugh Grant's statement claims that for years, News UK, as it is now called, lied about its involvement in phone hacking and illegal information gathering.

He said the company had a "vast, long-lasting and deliberate policy strategy plan of false denials and other concealment in relation to The Sun, to prevent me, and others in a similar position, from bringing claims against them."

This included, he said, false denials to the Leveson Inquiry into Press Standards, a press complaints body, and in public statements.

In recent years, News UK has settled a series of claims about illegal information gathering, without admitting liability.

The question of when victims of press intrusion learnt that they might have a case is crucial to this stage of the legal process because usually civil claims have to be brought within six years.

Many of the "hacking" claims date back much further, and could be dismissed as too old.

Mr Grant said in his statement that he only became fully aware of the intrusions into his personal life last year when a private investigator, Gavin Burrows, told him The Sun had hired private investigators to target him

Mr Grant said in his statement that he only became fully aware of the intrusions into his personal life last year when a private investigator, Gavin Burrows, told him The Sun had hired private investigators to target him.

"Mr Burrows had information that, in addition to hacking my phone and tapping my landline, he was aware that my premises had been burgled by people working for The Sun and that a tracking device had been placed in my car. I found this astonishing."

Hugh Grant told the Leveson Inquiry in 2011 that his flat had been broken into and that a story shortly afterwards had given details of the inside.
In the statement, he said: "I had no evidence that this burglary was carried out or commissioned on the instruction of the press, let alone The Sun".

He also learned that private investigators specialising in "blagging" medical information by ringing hospitals had also been paid to find out about the birth of his daughter to Tinglan Hong, his former partner.

"Although we did our best to keep this information out of the public domain, we suspected that it was leaked by the hospital to the media", he said.
 
A controlled explosion was held and a man was arrested outside Buckingham Palace after throwing suspected shotgun cartridges into palace grounds, police have said.

I guess there's a legitimate reason for Prince Harry to be concerned about security.
 
I have never really supported the Royal Family, The fact that you can be born into the Royal family and one day become head of state and gain everything without barely doing anything just does not sit right with me.

Unfortunately, what the people of the UK and other areas want we won't get as they seem set in stone that they will not go anywhere.
 
I have never really supported the Royal Family, The fact that you can be born into the Royal family and one day become head of state and gain everything without barely doing anything just does not sit right with me.

Unfortunately, what the people of the UK and other areas want we won't get as they seem set in stone that they will not go anywhere.
Everyone is different - some are for the monarchy, some are against it, others don’t care.
 
Everyone is different - some are for the monarchy, some are against it, others don’t care.
This is very true. They do seem to get a lot of support, even now with the coronation coming up, people are already camping out to get the good spots ready for the parade and such so there is huge support for them as opposed to those who do not support them.

I do know that there is a protest at the weekend and it would seem they are considering trying to disrupt the parade. The supporters will for sure outweigh them though.
 
This is very true. They do seem to get a lot of support, even now with the coronation coming up, people are already camping out to get the good spots ready for the parade and such so there is huge support for them as opposed to those who do not support them.

I do know that there is a protest at the weekend and it would seem they are considering trying to disrupt the parade. The supporters will for sure outweigh them though.
Some watch the coronation just out of interest, rather than support though I suppose.
 
Some watch the coronation just out of interest, rather than support though I suppose.
That is true, it's either that or it's due to curiosity rather than in support. Usually though if that is pretty much the only thing on TV a lot of people just leave it on due to it being something they can have on for background noise rather than being interested.
 
That is true, it's either that or it's due to curiosity rather than in support. Usually though if that is pretty much the only thing on TV a lot of people just leave it on due to it being something they can have on for background noise rather than being interested.
Agreed. By interest I mean curiousity haha :p
 
Anyone watched the coronation?
@Shortie
I didn't watch the actual coronation as I was busy at the time but I did watch the concert. The concert was good but you could tell the struggled to get people to be able to perform for it. I did hear that many declined the offer to perform.
 
718Threads
6,130Messages
61Members
KeraLatest member
Top